MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367845005 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24941

Modelling and parameter estimation of <i>trans</i> ‐ <i>β</i> ‐farnesene coordination polymerization

2023· article· en· W4367845005 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marília Caroline C. de Sá, Teresa Córdova, Prı́amo A. Melo, José Carlos Pinto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsMonomerPolymerizationPolymerChemistryKinetic energyCatalysisMolar massPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract trans ‐ β ‐Farnesene is a bio‐derived terpene monomer that can polymerize, generating polymers with properties that can be similar to the properties of conventional petroleum‐derived polymers. For this reason, in the present study, several coordination polymerizations of trans ‐ β ‐farnesene are carried out using the Ziegler–Natta catalyst system composed by neodymium versatate (), diisobutylaluminum hidride (DIBAH), and dimethyldichlorosilane (DMDCS) in order to evaluate the influence of key operation variables on the control of average molar masses and monomer conversion. A phenomenological model is proposed to describe the coordination polymerization of trans ‐ β ‐farnesene, and the kinetic parameters required to simulate the reactions are estimated. The initial concentration of DIBAH used as a chain transfer agent (CTA) is calculated by a data reconciliation procedure since this very active compound can participate in undesired side reactions. It is shown that the initial monomer, DIBAH, and concentrations exert strong influences on the monomer conversion and average molar masses of (poly)farnese while the temperature effect is not so pronounced. The proposed kinetic mechanism was able to predict well the experimental data collected during the reactions, with the successful reconciliation of CTA concentrations and estimation of model parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207