MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4367845291 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/7yzsr

Improving Health Behaviours and Clinical Factors in Individuals at Risk for Developing Noncommunicable Diseases: The ACCELERATION Program

2023· preprint· en· W4367845291 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Keven Joyal‐Desmarais, Simon Bacon, Shannon S. D. Bredin, Wanda Firth, Nicholas Giacomantonio, Jennifer M. Jones, Kim Lavoie, Jessica Nooyen, Darren E. R. Warburton, Paul Oh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstitutePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreNova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversité du Québec à MontréalInstitute for Knowledge MobilizationConcordia UniversityUniversity of TorontoCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
FundersHealth CanadaAstellas PharmaSanofiPartenariat Canadien Contre Le CancerGlaxoSmithKlinePfizer
KeywordsWaistMedicineDepression (economics)Body mass indexIntervention (counseling)GerontologyPhysical therapyBehavior changeEnvironmental healthPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs: e.g., heart disease, cancer) account for 71% of global deaths. Behavioural risk factors, like physical inactivity and inadequate nutrition, are crucial targets for effectively preventing such diseases. This cohort study evaluated the efficacy of a 12-week lifestyle behaviour change program, called ACCELERATION, for changing lifestyle behaviours (such as physical activity and diet) in individuals at risk of developing NCDs. ACCELERATION was rooted in evidence-based behaviour change techniques/frameworks (such as goal setting, action planning, and motivational communication). Methods. Individuals at risk for developing NCDs (N = 696) were recruited across four sites in Canada (British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) to participate in the ACCELERATION program. Healthy lifestyle behaviours (e.g., physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption) and markers of psychological/physical health (e.g., depression, blood pressure, waist circumference) were assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6-months post-intervention.Results. By the end of the intervention, participants had increased their weekly levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity by 76.4 minutes (95% CI: 58.8 to 93.9), and their daily consumption of fruits and vegetables by 0.5 cups (95% CI: 0.3 to 0.6). Participants also showed significant improvements in psychological function (lower depression, better sleep) and physical health (e.g., reduced blood cholesterol, body mass index, waist circumference). Positive changes were generally maintained by 6 months post-intervention. Interpretation. Our findings support the efficacy of the ACCELERATION program for improving healthy lifestyle behaviour change. Other programs may find it beneficial to incorporate similar behaviour change principles (e.g., motivational communication). Trial registration: NCT02264366

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.305
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBehavioral Health and Interventions→French-language works237,207→