MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367848914 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2867328/v1

Three Gorges Dam: Differential determinants and spatial-temporal effects of the change of snail density

2023· preprint· en· W4367848914 on OpenAlexaff
Yanfeng Gong, Yixin Tong, Honglin Jiang, Ning Xu, Jiangfan Yin, Jiamin Wang, Junhui Huang, Yue Chen, Qingwu Jiang, Shi‐Zhu Li, Yibiao Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSnailNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexEnvironmental scienceAbundance (ecology)Physical geographyGeographyEcologyClimate changeHydrology (agriculture)BiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND The abundance of Oncomelania hupensis snail can promote the transmission of schistosomiasis japonica. Snail distribution varies spatially and temporally in different geographical regions. Hence, we investigated differential drivers of snail density between the downstream and upstream areas of Three Gorges Dam (TGD), and spatial-temporal changes in snail abundance.METHODS We deployed the snail survey at 200 sites over 5 years to monitor a dynamic change in snail abundance within the Yangtze River basin. Corresponding variables that might affect snail abundance, such as Meteorology, vegetation, terrain, and economy, were collected from multiple data sources. We conducted the Bayesian spatial-temporal modeling framework to investigate the differential determinants and spatial-temporal effects of the change of snail density.RESULTS Obvious volatility for snail density was detected in the downstream area of TGD, whilst a small increment in the upstream area. For the downstream area of TGD, Snail density was positively associated with the average minimum temperature in January of the same year, annual normalized difference vegetation index of the previous year (NDVI), the 2nd quartile of average annual relative humidity of the previous year (RH), the 3rd quartile of RH, the 4th quartile of RH. Snail density was negatively associated with the average maximum temperature in July of the previous year, and annual night-time light of the previous year. An approximately inverted “U” curve of relative risk was detected among sites with a greater average annual ground surface temperature of the previous year. For the upstream area, snail density was positively associated with NDVI, the 2nd quartile of total precipitation of the previous year (Pre), the 3rd quartile of Pre, and the 4th quartile of Pre. Snail density was negatively associated with Slope.CONCLUSIONS Collectively, our study demonstrated a rebound in snail density between 2015 and 2019. In particular, temperature, humidity, vegetation, and human activity were the main drivers affecting the snail abundance in the downstream area of TGD, while precipitation, slope, and vegetation were the main drivers affecting the upstream snail abundance. This evidence can assist the authorities to execute more precise strategies for snail investigation and control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207