MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367849745 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2023.27057

Innovations to Address Social Isolation for Elderly Canadians Aging at Home

2023· article· en· W4367849745 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Neil Seeman

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessSocial isolationIsolation (microbiology)Metropolitan areaPublic relationsPandemicPublic healthHealth careMental healthNursingGerontologyPsychologySociologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Political scienceMedicineSocial psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, two interdisciplinary pan-Canadian research initiatives have illuminated the social isolation and loneliness of seniors who age at home. The National Institute on Ageing at Toronto Metropolitan University and the Canadian Coalition for Seniors' Mental Health are exemplars in how to treat healthcare innovations as opportunities to create a sustainable high-quality healthcare system. Knowledge translation and communication with the public are core to the values and strategy of both organizations. Clinician leaders at these organizations take a holistic approach to understanding and communicating the importance of social isolation and loneliness among seniors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207