Etude osteomorphometrique du coxal et du sacrum chez des races de chiens predisposes a la dysplasie de la hanche, application a la creation d'une nouvelle plaque de triple osteotomie du bassin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La triple osteotomie du bassin est une operation complexe qui gagnerait a etre standardisee. Ses principales complications sont le lâchage d'implants et le retrecissement de la filiere pelvienne. L'objectif de notre etude etait de creer une nouvelle plaque de triple osteotomie adaptable a tout chien de race predisposee a la dysplasie, en s'assurant d'ancrer deux vis dans le sacrum pour limiter le lâchage d'implants. Cette etude porta sur trois races de chiens predisposees a la dysplasie, le labrador, le berger allemand et le rottweiler. La population etudiee etait constituee de douze chiens , a raison de quatre specimens par race. L'etude osteomorphometrique du coxal et du sacrum a revele une variabilite importante, directement dependante de la race, la surface du corps sacral presente une variation allant de 181 mm' a 304 mm' dans l'echantillon etudie. De plus, a cette variation importante s'ajoute l'absence de portion commune de corps sacral a l'ensemble de l'echantillon. L'absence de bassin standard et de projection commune de corps sacral compromet la realisation d'une plaque standard de triple osteotomie du bassin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".