MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368246523 · doi:10.53625/jabdi.v2i9.4839

PENDAMPINGAN PENYEDIAAN SARANA AIR BERSIH DI DESA WISATA STONE PARK BUKIT PERTAPAN TURUNAN GIRISUKO PANGGANG GUNUNGKIDUL

2023· article· id· W4368246523 on OpenAlexaff
Riani Nurdin, Marni Astuti, Yasrin Zabidi, Eko Poerwanto

Bibliographic record

VenueJ-ABDI Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyForestryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desa Turunan, Girisuko, Panggang, Gunungkidul, secara swadaya membentuk Kelompok Tani Hutan Wono Asri Handayani, Kelompok Tani tersebut mengawali ide membangun dan mengembangkan desa wisata Stone Park Bukit Pertapan secara gotong royong yang melibatkan warga sekitar. Dengan pemandangannya yang indah banyak pengunjung yang menginap dengan mendirikan tenda karena tidak ingin kehilangan momen menikmati sunset di pagi hari. Permasalahan yang ada adalah kebutuhan air bersih yang sangat minim, untuk memenuhi kebutuhan pengunjung baik yang menginap maupun tidak menginap. Kebutuhan air bersih merupakan syarat wajib yang harus dipenuhi oleh sebuah desa wisata guna menjamin kenyamanan dan kepuasan pengunjung. Dengan luas area wisata yang besar dan terbagi menjadi beberapa spot tempat untuk melihat pemandangan dan gua, hanya memiliki 1(satu) toilet dengan 1 (satu) penampungan air. Berkat adanya pendampingan yang dilaksanakan dari Teknik Industri ITDA telah menambah 1(satu) toilet dan 1 (satu) penampungan air di destinasi wisata Stone Park.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJ-ABDI Jurnal Pengabdian kepada MasyarakatSame topicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207