MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368248196 · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1

Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

2023· book· en· W4368248196 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Francisco José García‐Peñalvo, Alicia García‐Holgado

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in educational technology · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEngineering Education and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad de LeónUniversidad de DeustoUniversidad de ExtremaduraUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaUniversidad Tecnológica de PereiraPontificia Universidad Católica del PerúUniversitat de LleidaUniversidad de ValladolidUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosInstituto Politécnico do PortoUniversidade de VigoOulun YliopistoUniversitat de ValènciaUniversidade de CoimbraUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaAalto-YliopistoUniversita degli Studi di Bari Aldo MoroDublin City UniversityInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyUniversitat Jaume IUniversidade da Beira InteriorUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad de CádizUniversidad del NorteUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaAristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversidad de La LagunaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoTrinity College DublinUniversidad Tecnológica NacionalUniversidad Politécnica de MadridUniversidad de ZaragozaUniversité Abdelmalek EssaadiUniversidad de AlicantePontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoUniversidad de GranadaUniversidad de NavarraUniversidad de SalamancaItä-Suomen YliopistoUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsMultidisciplinary approachPerspective (graphical)Political scienceEngineering ethicsEnvironmental ethicsGeographySociologySocial scienceEngineeringComputer sciencePhilosophyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in educational technologySame topicEngineering Education and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207