CTGF is a Modifiable Mediator of Flow-dependent Atherosclerosis under Peripheral Artery Disease Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the 3 rd leading type of atherosclerotic disease (ASD) morbidity. Arterial stiffness is intimately connected to the onset and progression of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The role of arterial stiffening on flow-mediated atherosclerotic plaque formation is not well understood. The objective of this study is to discover endothelial cell (EC) pathways under PAD conditions and test the modifiability of these pathways on ASD. Methods PAD conditions in mice were conferred by partial carotid ligation to induce disturbed Flow (D-flow) in pre-stiffened Fibulin-5 knockout (KO) mice that lack normal elastin function. EC pathways, including Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN) were quantified by gene analysis and histology. Atherogenic mice had PCSK9 infection + high fat diet. CTGF was inhibited in an EC-specific knockout (ECKO CTGF ) and with a CTGF antibody (FG-3149). Human vascular tissue was used to validate PAD biomechanics and CTGF upregulation. Results Biomechanical testing demonstrated that d-flow KO arteries mimic biomechanics of PAD arteries. RNA microarray, qPCR, and immunohistochemistry identified EC plasticity in these arteries compared to WT and KO under stable flow. Under atherogenic conditions, KO arteries demonstrated vulnerable plaques not seen in WT animals. CTGF expression was increased by d-flow, in KO arteries, in aged (18 months) WT arteries, and vascular tissue under d-flow. CTGF inhibition by ECKO CTGF favorably improved plaque characteristics in male but not female animals. FG-3149 treatment of ECWT CTGF male animals delivered similar benefits to plaque characteristics and arterial compliance. Conclusion ECs in PAD arteries exist under a complex hemodynamic environment that integrates stiffness and d-flow into an atherogenic and inflammatory environment. Stiffness + d-flow stimulates precocious onset of EC plasticity and a vulnerable plaque phenotype. CTGF is a matricellular protein that can tune fibro-inflammatory pathways. CTGF is a prominent mediator of D-flow-mediated arterial remodeling and focal atherosclerotic plaque remodeling. Inhibition of CTGF improves plaque phenotype and arterial compliance. CTGF-associated pathways hold promise as therapeutic targets for PAD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".