MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368365366 · doi:10.1201/9781003348030-405

Experimental study on ultimate bearing capacity of shield tunnel segments under unloading conditions

2023· book-chapter· en· W4368365366 on OpenAlexaff
Kang ZHANG, Xiaoqin Zhang, Qingyu Zhang, Ziyi Pei, Linfan Qi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShieldBearing capacityStructural engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringGeologyPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at the 5.9 m inner diameter segment structure of a metro tunnel in a coastal city of China, the bearing performance and damage law of segments under extreme unloading conditions are experimentally studied based on the full-scale test loading platform of Tongji University. The test results show that in the design load stage, the horizontal and vertical convergence deformation and internal force of the segment increase linearly with the change of external load, and the increase is less than 18%. The maximum deformation and internal force of the segment mainly occur at the arch waist. After entering the unloading stage, the transverse and vertical convergence deformation of the segment increases obviously. The maximum transverse and longitudinal deformation of the structure in the final failure state is 185 mm and 189 mm respectively. Hence, it means that the tunnel enters the unloading condition when the lateral deformation rate of the tunnel is greater than 20% in the actual project. At this time, reinforcement measures should be taken as soon as possible to intervene against the impact of lateral unloading on the tunnel structure. The corresponding transverse convergence deformation of the first longitudinal seam bolt when yielding is 149 mm, and the corresponding transverse convergence deformation of the first circumferential seam bolt when yielding is 169 mm. In the final failure state, segment cracks mainly occur at the top, bottom and the arch waist of the tunnel structure. At the same time, the convergence deformation of segment structure at these locations is relatively larger. The experimental results can provide a scientific basis for optimizing segment structure design and carrying out structural safety evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207