Psychopathology of anorexia nervosa: a defence from depression. An interpretation according to Massimo Fagioli’s Human Birth Theory – two case reports
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on anorexia nervosa with an emphasis on its onset and treatment, and it particularly addresses two aspects of the disease, which seem completely in contrast with one another – prolonged fasting and recurrent episodes of binge eating/purging behaviour. From a psychopathological viewpoint, these can be considered two symptoms of the same disease, whose psychopathological core is often depression. The anorexic phase is characterised by control of food intake and interpersonal relationships due to a paralysis of affections and mental rigidity, which often provide a schizoid defence against depression and sometimes against fragmentation. In the bulimic phase, a break in this defence reveals violent and uncontrollable affects beneath depression. One possible hypothesis to evaluate would be whether these alternating phases can be overcome if they are interpreted as a false resolution of an intrapsychic conflict as defined by Fagioli’s Human Birth Theory, based on a psychic defence reaction that may arise in newborns, and which he termed annulment pulsion. If pathogenic factors are present in the first year of life, the annulment pulsion may become pathological and can explain the psychosis in anorexia nervosa patients. This paper presents two clinical cases involving two young women, one suffering from anorexia nervosa purging type with self-induced vomiting complicated by comorbid drug abuse and the other suffering from anorexia nervosa binge eating/purging type and comorbid drug and alcohol abuse. Both were successfully treated with psychodynamic psychotherapy (individual and in groups) based on the interpretation of dreams according to Human Birth Theory, which posits that a dream is a thought expressing itself through images. The patients were treated for 4 and 5 years, respectively. The scores on three standardised tools, Eating Disorder Inventory-3, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Toronto Alexithymia Scale, administered before and at the end of treatment, accurately reflected their baseline condition and their clinical improvement. The treatment induced a reduction or resolution of symptoms and a qualitative improvement in the patients’ oneiric activity. The encouraging outcomes for these patients support the interpretative hypothesis proposed in this article and the value of the approach based on Human Birth Theory in treating anorexia nervosa. Further work on the subject is clearly warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".