Estimating Effective Leaf Area Index of Winter Wheat Based on UAV Point Cloud Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leaf area index (LAI) is a widely used plant biophysical parameter required for modelling plant photosynthesis and crop yield estimation. UAV remote sensing plays an increasingly important role in providing the data source needed for LAI extraction. This study proposed a UAV-derived 3-D point cloud-based method to automatically calculate crop-effective LAI (LAIe). In this method, the 3-D winter wheat point cloud data filtered out of bare ground points was projected onto a hemisphere, and then the gap fraction was calculated through the hemispherical image obtained by projecting the sphere onto a plane. A single-angle inversion method and a multi-angle inversion method were used, respectively, to calculate the LAIe through the gap fraction. The results show a good linear correlation between the calculated LAIe and the field LAIe measured by the digital hemispherical photography method. In particular, the multi-angle inversion method of stereographic projection achieved the highest accuracy, with an R2 of 0.63. The method presented in this paper performs well in LAIe estimation of the main leaf development stages of the winter wheat growth cycle. It offers an effective means for mapping crop LAIe without the need for reference data, which saves time and cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".