MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4368374526 · doi:10.54026/jmms/1057

Critical Materials - Global Outlook and Canadian Perspective

2023· article· en· W4368374526 on OpenAlexaffabout
George J. Simandl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersDivision of Ocean Sciences
KeywordsGeopoliticsEconomic shortageClimate changeBusinessPerspective (graphical)National securityPolitical sciencePoliticsGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ongoing geopolitical tensions and armed conflicts are causing most governing bodies in the free world to become concerned with the availability of materials essential for the national security and economic well-being of populations within their jurisdictions. Overlapping with these concerns are commitments to combat climate change. Consequently, current critical material lists for these jurisdictions highlight materials that are at risk of supply disruption (or future shortage) and are essential for one or more of the following domains: national defense, economic health, and the fight against climate change. Battery, Magnet, and Photovoltaic (BM&P) materials are essential for all three of these domains. Therefore, projects involving these materials benefit from unprecedented interest from mineral producing and manufacturing industries, investors, the public, and governments. Technically and economically sound BM&P projects represent exceptional development opportunities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207