MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372046818 · doi:10.4103/jss.jss_99_22

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Gujarati Version Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Patellofemoral Subscale for Early Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Population

2022· article· en· W4372046818 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heta Pavan Patel, M Balaganapathy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Scientific Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyCronbach's alphaOsteoarthritisPopulationGujaratiConvergent validityArthritisContext (archaeology)Clinical psychologyPsychometricsInternal consistencyInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: The condition of knee pain is common across Gujarat state but identification of joint structure involvement is burdensome in the early cases. The earliest symptom/s patients reported early are anterior knee pain and difficulty in weight-bearing activities. By reviewing the related literature, the researcher states that these symptoms frame the involvement of patellofemoral joints. A dialect tool is not available to evaluate the symptoms of Gujarati speaking population. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral (KOOS-PF) scale was developed in the year 2018 using COSMIN guidelines for spotting patellofemoral disorders. It was a valid tool published in the English language. Aims: The study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate of KOOS-PF scale in the Gujarati language for the early patellofemoral arthritis population. Settings and Design: This validation study was carried out in six regional orthopedic hospitals. Subjects and Methods: A translation and cross-cultural adaptation process was conducted using Beaton D. 2002 guidelines. It was administered to 144 early patellofemoral arthritis patients to determine the psychometric properties. Results: A total of 144 participants with a mean age of 46.61 ± 4.31 were recruited. The internal consistency measures showed low Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.124). The participants completed the second administration of the Gujarati version scale for good test–retest reliability , r = 0.938. There were no floor and ceiling effects. The convergent validity was confirmed with a moderate negative correlation with Gujarati version modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index ( r = −0.527). Factor analysis explained that the scale was loaded on three factors. Conclusions: The analysis identified deficits in reliability and convergent validity of the Gujarati version of the KOOS-PF scale suggestive of the development of a new condition-specific tool for the early cases which can be used in research and clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Scientific SocietySame topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207