MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372057056 · doi:10.1080/24720038.2021.2009837

The Case of Darren in the Context of Historical, Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence towards and among Australia’s First Nations Peoples: A Response to Joye Weisel-Barth’s <i>Case of Angie</i>

2022· article· en· W4372057056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gerard Webster

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychoanalysis Self and Context · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShameTransgenerational epigeneticsContext (archaeology)Domestic violenceCriminologyPunishment (psychology)SociologySexual violenceGender studiesPsychologySocial psychologyHistoryPoison controlSuicide preventionMedicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence (FDSV) is a serious problem that is hidden in plain sight among all communities around the world. Psychoanalysts and psychotherapists have listened collectively to millions of stories from our patients about their experiences of FDSV and how it has harmed them deeply and enduringly. Joye Weisel-Barth’s paper, Shame and Punishment: The Case of Angie provides an excellent account of the added complexity of the recovery process from FDSV when traumatic experiences are endured concomitantly with historical, transgenerational trauma resulting from racist violence. This article considers the problem of FDSV in Australia’s First Nations communities who have been the targets of extreme racist violence for over two hundred years. The ways that contemporary psychoanalysts and psychotherapists can join other professionals in providing a holistic, culturally safe, and trauma-informed system of responses to FDSV survivors are then explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0090.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychoanalysis Self and ContextSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207