MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4372194226 · doi:10.2196/46435

Adapting Effective mHealth Interventions to Improve Uptake and Adherence to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Thai Young Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2023· article· en· W4372194226 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bo Wang, Rena Janamnuaysook, Karen MacDonell, Chokechai Rongkavilit, Elizabeth Schieber, Sylvie Naar, Nittaya Phanuphak

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsPre-exposure prophylaxisMen who have sex with menMotivational interviewingPsychological interventionMedicineIntervention (counseling)mHealthFamily medicinePopulationRandomized controlled trialHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Focus groupNursingEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Young men who have sex with men (YMSM) are the fastest-growing HIV-positive population worldwide. Thailand has the highest adult HIV seroprevalence in Asia; over 25% of men having sex with men in Bangkok are HIV positive. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an efficacious HIV prevention strategy recommended for all at-risk individuals. PrEP is highly effective when taken as prescribed, but PrEP utilization rate has been low, and adherence is often inadequate. OBJECTIVE: We propose to develop and pilot a multicomponent, technology-based intervention to promote motivation to begin PrEP ("uptake") and sustained adherence to PrEP among HIV-negative Thai YMSM. We will adapt an existing 2-session technology-delivered, motivational interviewing-based intervention to focus on PrEP use in YMSM in Thailand. The resulting intervention is called the Motivational Enhancement System for PrEP Uptake and Adherence (MES-PrEP). We will also develop motivational text messaging (MTM) to send two-way motivational messages to promote PrEP use. METHODS: The proposed study includes 3 phases. Phase 1 includes in-depth interviews with HIV-negative Thai YMSM and providers to explore barriers and facilitators of PrEP initiation and adherence, aiming to inform intervention content. Phase 2 consists of adapting and beta-testing MES-PrEP and MTM for functionality and feasibility using a youth advisory board of Thai YMSM. In Phase 3, we will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of MES-PrEP and MTM to increase PrEP uptake and adherence among Thai YMSM. A total of 60 HIV-negative Thai YMSM who have not started PrEP and 60 YMSM who are on PrEP but not adherent to it will be randomized 2:1 to receive MES-PrEP and MTM (n=40) or standard PrEP counseling (n=20). The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention will be assessed through usage patterns and the System Usability Scale. The preliminary impact will be assessed by evaluating the proportion of PrEP initiation and level of adherence to PrEP. Participants will complete the assessments at baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month postintervention. Biomarkers of adherence to PrEP and biomarkers of HIV and sexually transmitted infections will be collected. RESULTS: Recruitment for this study began in January 2022 for phase 1. Qualitative interviews were completed with 30 YMSM and 5 clinical providers in May 2022. Phase 3, the pilot feasibility and acceptability trial, began in July 2023. Upon project completion, we shall have developed a highly innovative mobile health intervention to support YMSM using PrEP, which will be ready for testing in a larger efficacy trial. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses a critical problem (ie, high HIV incidence and low PrEP use) among Thai YMSM. We are developing 2 potentially synergistic technology-based, theory-driven interventions aimed at maximizing PrEP use. The proposed project has the potential to make significant contributions to advancing HIV prevention research and implementation science. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05243030; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05243030. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46435.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.007
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0080.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.422 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→