MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analisis Pengaruh PMDN Dan PMA Terhadap PDRB Jawa Timur

2022· article· id· W4372202786 on OpenAlexaff
Erika Dwi Fitriyani, Ladi Wajuba Perdini Fisabilillah

Bibliographic record

VenueIndependent Journal of Economics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pada utamanya PDRB adalah total angka bertambah yang diterima pada semua sektor usaha di zona eksklusif maupun total jumlah barang serta jasa paling terakhir yang diterima pada semua unit perekonomian di zona eksklusif. Tujuan adanya dari penelitian ini yaitu agar melihat dampak penanaman modal dalam dan luar negeri pada PDRB di Wilayah Jawa Timur. Metode uji running yang dipakai yaitu penelitian kuantitatif. Sumber data yang dipakai mrupakan data bersifat sekunder dari BPS Jawa Timur, dengan data time series pada periode 2011-2020. Hasil analisis regresi berganda diketahui bahwa tingkat penanaman modal dalam negeri serta luar negeri memiliki pengaruh signifikansi terhadap tingkat PDRB daerah Jawa Timur

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndependent Journal of EconomicsSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207