MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372215941 · doi:10.1145/3572334.3572387

Son Mis Datos: Building Personal Data Literacies through Citizen Data Audits

2022· article· en· W4372215941 on OpenAlexafffund
Katherine Reilly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAuditData accessPublic relationsData sharingOpen dataBusinessInternet privacyComputer sciencePolitical scienceWorld Wide WebAccountingDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports the results of a pilot projct to build functional, reflexive, critical and tactical personal data literacies through citizen audits of corporate data practices in the digital economy. The project, called Son Mis Datos (It's My Data), leveraged the personal data access provisions of Peru's national data protection law to help participants access the personal data that private companies hold about them. The work was completed in collaboration with the Peruvian digital rights advocate HiperDerecho which built a website called http://www.SonMisDatos.pe to facilitate personal data requests. Once participants had requested their data, they were invited to conduct citizen data audits of corporate data practices. The project found that citizen data audits are an effective tool for building personal data literacies, and they also show promise for supporting a more engaged citizenry equipped to build a more citizen-centric data economy. However, the project also found that in order to realize this promise, it is important to confront the liberal and individualistic tendencies of privacy frameworks, and find ways to anchor both citizen data audits and personal data literacies in the criteria and local cognitive processes of the affected communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207