Bibliographic record
Abstract
The production of prismatic dislocation loops in nuclear reactor core materials results in hardening because the loops impede dislocation motion. Yielding often occurs by a localised clearing of the loops through interactions with gliding dislocations called channeling. The cleared channels represent a softer material within which most of the subsequent deformation is localized. Channeling is often associated with hypothetical dislocation pileup and intergranular cracking in reactor components although the channels themselves do not amplify stress as one would expect from a pileup. The channels are often similar in appearance to twins leading to the possibility that twins are sometimes mistakenly identified as channels. Neither twins nor dislocation channels, which are bulk shears, produce the same stress conditions as a pileup on a single plane. At high doses, when cavities are produced (either He-stabilised bubbles at low temperatures or voids at high temperatures), there can be reduced ductility because the material is already in an equivalent advanced stage of microscopic necking. He-stabilised cavities form preferentially on grain boundaries and at precipitate or incoherent twin/ε-martensite interfaces. The higher planar density of the cavities, coupled with the incompatibility at the interface, results in a preferential failure known as He embrittlement. Strain localisation and inter- or intragranular failure are dependent on many factors that are ultimately microstructural in nature. The mechanisms are described and discussed in relation to reactor core materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".