MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372313989 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102288

Protocol for electrotaxis of large epithelial cell sheets

2023· article· en· W4372313989 on OpenAlexafffund
Yan Zhang, Rachel Lee, Zijie Zhu, Yaohui Sun, Kan Zhu, Zhengping Xu, Francis Lin, Tingrui Pan, Wolfgang Losert, Min Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNational Eye InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMultidisciplinary University Research InitiativeNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaShenzhen Fundamental Research ProgramShenzhen Engineering Laboratory of Single-molecule Detection and Instrument DevelopmentHangzhou Normal UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCellMotilityPolydimethylsiloxaneProtocol (science)Cell migrationBiologyComputer scienceCell biologyNanotechnologyMaterials sciencePathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, we present a protocol for electrotaxis of large epithelial cell sheets without compromising the integrity of cell epithelia in a high-throughput customized directed current electrotaxis chamber. We describe the fabrication and use of polydimethylsiloxane stencils to control the size and shape of human keratinocyte cell sheets. We detail cell tracking, cell sheet contour assay, and particle image velocimetry to reveal the spatial and temporal motility dynamics of cell sheets. This approach is applicable to other collective cell migration studies. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Zhang et al. (2022).1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationFrench-language works237,207