Book Review: <i>Place, Race and Politics: The Anatomy of a Law and Order Crisis</i> by Leanne Weber, Jarrett Blaustein, Kathryn Benier, Rebecca Wickes and Diana Johns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In March 2016, an episode of violence that occurred between groups of youth and police at a public festival in Melbourne, Australia instigated an extended law and order crisis about the criminality of African migrants in the Australian state of Victoria.In Place, Race, and Politics: The Anatomy of a Law and Order Crisis, Weber et al. track how this crisis was conditioned by racialized relations of belonging that have contributed to the marginality and insecurity of Sudanese and South Sudanese communities in the region.Framed as a monograph, the book weaves together a number of otherwise distinct research projects on the criminalization of African communities in Melbourne to document how the law and order crisis was at once precipitated and framed by the different institutional practices of local media, state politicians, and law enforcement.If the book can be understood as an experiment in form, it is a successful one insofar as the authors have crafted a cohesive explanatory narrative that conveys how the specific practices of these institutions have converged to delimit and refigure the political circumstances of local African communities.Given the scope of analysis that is facilitated by the authors' collaboration, this book should be instructive for other groups of researchers wanting to write across the results of different projects to explicate a given event or issue from multiple vantage points.The book takes a number of compositional and theoretical cues from Policing the Crisis, a multi-author study led by Stuart Hall that is now a classic in cultural studies and critical criminology (Hall et al., 1978).Policing the Crisis tracks how a racialized moral panic about muggings in the United Kingdom during the 1970s helped facilitate the transition to a neoliberal ethos of law and order (Hall et al., 1978).Echoing the conclusions of Policing the Crisis, Weber et al. demonstrate the media's formative role in advancing these kinds of political agendas; their time series analysis of media reports from 2007 to 2020 even plots a decisive peak in references to "African gangs" immediately after Victorian state elections in 2018.Yet, Weber et al. also situate their analysis in recent literatures on border criminologies to prioritize how this law and order crisis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".