Integration of data‐independent acquisition (DIA) with co‐fractionation mass spectrometry (CF‐MS) to enhance interactome mapping capabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteomics technologies are continually advancing, providing opportunities to develop stronger and more robust protein interaction networks (PINs). In part, this is due to the ever-growing number of high-throughput proteomics methods that are available. This review discusses how data-independent acquisition (DIA) and co-fractionation mass spectrometry (CF-MS) can be integrated to enhance interactome mapping abilities. Furthermore, integrating these two techniques can improve data quality and network generation through extended protein coverage, less missing data, and reduced noise. CF-DIA-MS shows promise in expanding our knowledge of interactomes, notably for non-model organisms (NMOs). CF-MS is a valuable technique on its own, but upon the integration of DIA, the potential to develop robust PINs increases, offering a unique approach for researchers to gain an in-depth understanding into the dynamics of numerous biological processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".