MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Representation Learning of Clinical Multivariate Time Series with Random Filter Banks

2023· article· en· W4372346309 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Keshavarzian, Hojjat Salehinejad, Shahrokh Valaee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcatenation (mathematics)Computer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Time seriesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningRandom forestClassifier (UML)Multivariate statisticsRepresentation (politics)Time domainGeneralizationPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning and deep learning models for time series classification generally require a large volume of data to achieve superior performance. However, due to the lack of a sufficient amount of time series in many real-world applications, particularly health care, training these models is more challenging than expected. This paper introduces the Random Frequency Butchering (RFB) method to enhance the generalization performance of classification tasks on limited time series in health care. This approach generates a number of filters with random cutoff frequencies in the frequency domain. The concatenation of time series representations from these filters stacked with the original time series is then used to train an arbitrary time series classifier. The experimental results on the standard medical time series datasets show that the RFB time series representation can significantly enhance the classification performance of the MiniRocket, Inception-Net, and ResNet classifiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207