Longitudinal diffusion and volumetric kinetics of head and neck cancer magnetic resonance on a 1.5T MR-Linear accelerator hybrid system: A prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a imaging biomarker characterization/ pre-qualification study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objectives We aim to characterize the serial quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes of the target disease volume using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquired weekly during radiation therapy (RT) on a 1.5T MR-Linac and correlate these changes with tumor response and oncologic outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients as part of a programmatic R-IDEAL biomarker characterization effort. Methods Thirty patients with pathologically confirmed HNSCC who received curative-intent RT at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, were included in this prospective study. Baseline and weekly Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (weeks 1-6) were obtained, and various ADC parameters (mean, 5 th , 10 th , 20 th , 30 th , 40 th , 50 th , 60 th , 70 th , 80 th , 90 th and 95 th percentile) were extracted from the target regions of interest (ROIs). Baseline and weekly ADC parameters were correlated with response during RT, loco-regional control, and the development of recurrence using the Mann-Whitney U test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the weekly ADC versus baseline values. Weekly volumetric changes (Δvolume) for each ROI were correlated with ΔADC using Spearman’s Rho test. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to identify the optimal ΔADC threshold associated with different oncologic outcomes. Results There was an overall significant rise in all ADC parameters during different time points of RT compared to baseline values for both gross primary disease volume (GTV-P) and gross nodal disease volumes (GTV-N). The increased ADC values for GTV-P were statistically significant only for primary tumors achieving complete remission (CR) during RT. RPA identified GTV-P ΔADC 5 th percentile >13% at the 3 rd week of RT as the most significant parameter associated with CR for primary tumor during RT (p <0.001). Baseline ADC parameters for GTV-P and GTV-N didn’t significantly correlate with response to RT or other oncologic outcomes. There was a significant decrease in residual volume of both GTV-P & GTV-N throughout the course of RT. Additionally, a significant negative correlation between mean ΔADC and Δvolume for GTV-P at the 3 rd and 4 th week of RT was detected (r = -0.39, p = 0.044 & r = -0.45, p = 0.019, respectively). Conclusion Assessment of ADC kinetics at regular intervals throughout RT seems to be correlated with RT response. Further studies with larger cohorts and multi-institutional data are needed for validation of ΔADC as a model for prediction of response to RT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".