MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372346769 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180431

Study of the Efficiency of Using Facilities Based on Renewable Energy Sources for Charging Electric Vehicles in Kazakhstan

2023· article· en· W4372346769 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sayat Shaimurunov, Kuanysh Ryspayev, Arman Ismailov, Azamat Zhikeyev, Bulat Salykоv

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyEnvironmental scienceElectric vehicleEnvironmental economicsAutomotive engineeringBusinessNatural resource economicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringEconomicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the process of popularisation of electric vehicles in Kazakhstan is considered in more detail, since there is a small number of these transports, which negatively affects the economy and ecology of the country.The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficiency of the use of electric vehicles and the use of facilities based on renewable energy sources for charging them on the territory of Kazakhstan.The research methodology is the analysis of literature sources to investigate the efficiency of the use of electric vehicles, the correct development of models for the location of charging stations, and the efficiency of renewable energy sources as a way to boost the economy and reduce energy costs.The ways of popularising electric vehicles in the country were considered.The modelling of charging stations for electric vehicles was studied.In addition, the electric vehicle batteries were investigated.This study can be used to support decision-making for the design of charging stations for electric vehicles in the cities of Kazakhstan, which would bring economic and environmental benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207