Fiscal Policy as a Guarantee of Sustainable Development under Military Conditions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of sustainable development, the stimulating effect of fiscal policy is of particular importance, which is aimed at minimizing the consequences of such problems, ensuring the sustainability of state and local budgets, and creating the necessary prerequisites for their filling.The purpose of the article is to deepen the theoretical and methodological foundations for the formation and implementation of fiscal policy under martial law and its impact on the sustainable development of the state.The object of the study is the fiscal policy of a single country.During the study, different theoretical methods were used, but the IDEF modeling technique was the basis.It is substantiated that under martial law, fiscal policy needs to diversify the economy by optimizing the use of available and searching for untapped resources to ensure sustainable development.The main model for increasing the efficiency of fiscal policy in the context of sustainable development is presented.The innovativeness of the results of the study is revealed on the basis of the presented methodological approaches to the formation and implementation of the fiscal policy to guarantee sustainable development through modeling to increase its effectiveness.The study has limitations and concerns the concentration on the fiscal policy of one state.Further research will include expanding the stages of modeling and analyzing the impact of threats to sustainable development in the context of the implementation of fiscal policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it