Geodynamic and climatic forcing on late-Cenozoic exhumation of the Southern Patagonian Andes (Fitz Roy and Torres del Paine massifs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep incised glacial valleys surrounded by high peaks form the modern topography of the Southern Patagonian Andes. Two Miocene plutonic complexes in the Andean retroarc, the cores of the Fitz Roy (49°S) and Torres del Paine (51°S) massifs, were emplaced at 16.7±0.3 Ma and 12.5±0.1 Ma, respectively. Subduction of ocean ridge segments initiated at 54°S, generating northward opening of an asthenospheric window with associated mantle upwelling and orogenic shortening since 16 Ma. Subsequently, the onset of major glaciations at 7 Ma caused drastic changes in the regional topographic evolution. To constrain the respective contributions of tectonic convergence, mantle upwelling and fluvio-glacial erosion to rock exhumation, we present inverse thermal modeling of a new dataset of zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He from the two massifs, complemented by apatite 4He/3He data for Torres del Paine. Our results show rapid rock exhumation recorded in the Fitz Roy massif between 10.5 and 9 Ma, which we ascribe to mantle upwelling and/or crustal shortening due to ridge subduction at 49°S. Both massifs record a pulse of rock exhumation between 6.5 and 4.5 Ma, which we interpret as the result of the onset of Patagonian glaciations. After a period of erosional quiescence during the Miocene/Pliocene transition, increased rock exhumation since 3-2 Ma to present day is interpreted as the result of alpine glacial valley carving promoted by reinforced glacial-interglacial cycles. This study demonstrates that along-strike thermochronological studies provide us with the means to assess the spatio-temporal variations in tectonic, mantle, and surface processes forcing on rock exhumation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".