MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372349876 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180407

Circular Economy: Barriers and Strategy to Reduce and Manage Solid Waste in the Rural Area at Jepara District, Indonesia

2023· article· en· W4372349876 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dino Rimantho, Budhi Muliawan Suyitno, Vector Anggit Pratomo, Gunady Haryanto, I Nyoman Teguh Prasidha, Nungky Puspita

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWaste Management and Recycling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirektorat Jenderal Pendidikan TinggiKementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
KeywordsCircular economyBusinessMunicipal solid wasteRural areaRural economySolid waste managementEnvironmental planningWaste managementGeographyEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term circular economy (CE) refers to a new idea that transforms the old idea of the linear economy, which created the take-make-distribution-disposal-disposal model to take-makedistribution-consume back.When a product reaches its final stage, it will not be discarded; instead, it will be sent back in a form or quality different from the original.The 6R principles: reduce, reuse, recycle, recover, redesign, and remanufacture, are considered during the return process.Several challenges must be overcome for a circular economy to be implemented.However, no one has yet identified and analyzed the difficulties that hinder the implementation of a circular economy in Indonesia, especially in Jepara Regency.This study aims to identify and analyze the difficulties that hinder the implementation of a circular economy in waste management and make plans to overcome them.Five respondents from various stakeholder groups participated in this research, including local government, academics, and nongovernmental organizations.The questionnaire was processed using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) technique to identify the main obstacles.The results show that the critical factor inhibiting the implementation of a circular economy is the price for building a waste collection, storage, processing, and disposal (B8) system and government initiatives to decide on implementation (B2).Furthermore, based on respondents' assessments, the cost of collecting waste (B16) and the practice of disposing of hazardous waste (B1) waste that is not regulated is at the second level.Waste management requires a model that follows the circular economy principle to answer these inhibiting factors.The waste bank model is the most appropriate to apply to ensure the circular economy concept is running.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicWaste Management and RecyclingFrench-language works237,207