MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372352835 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.180225

Utilization of Tropical Forest Cacao Dried Leaves for Environment Improvement

2023· article· en· W4372352835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adam Malik, Mery Napitupulu, Nurasyah Dewi Napitupulu, Daud K. Walanda, Alam Anshary

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTropical rain forestAgroforestryTropical forestAgricultural engineeringTropical agricultureForestryEnvironmental scienceRainforestGeographyBotanyBiologyEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) is a plant that grows in a tropical forest environment that requires shade to avoid whole light.This plant can be broadly divided into two parts: the vegetative part, which includes roots, stems, and leaves, and the generative function, which includes flowers, fruit, and seeds.The productive part of cacao is a product with high economic value, while the vegetative part, such as dry leaves, has not been widely used.This study aims to determine the characteristics of activated carbon from cacao leaves taken from plantation locations near tropical forests in Central Sulawesi and its use to improve water quality by reducing TSS and improving pH values.The parameters observed were yield, moisture, ash, and fixed carbon.The quality of activated carbon meets the technical quality requirements for activated carbon (SNI 06-3730-1995) for water content and ash content, namely 5.1% (maximum 15%) and 1.12% (maximum 10%), but has a bound carbon content of 37.97% (minimum 65%).Generally, the performance of tofu wastewater treated with activated charcoal changes with increasing pH value and decreasing TSS value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFrench-language works237,207