MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4372404296 · doi:10.1353/tech.2023.0098

Strands of Modernization: The Circulation of Technology and Business Practices in East Asia, 1850–1920 ed. by David B. Sicilia and David G. Wittner

2023· article· en· W4372404296 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryContext (archaeology)Theme (computing)East AsiaAgency (philosophy)Circulation (fluid dynamics)HistoryBusiness historyEconomic historyChinaPolitical scienceSociologyLawEngineeringArchaeologySocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Strands of Modernization: The Circulation of Technology and Business Practices in East Asia, 1850–1920 ed. by David B. Sicilia and David G. Wittner Mila Davids (bio) Strands of Modernization: The Circulation of Technology and Business Practices in East Asia, 1850–1920 Edited by David B. Sicilia and David G. Wittner. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. Pp. 208. This collection of essays aims to highlight the circulation of technology and business practices within East Asia and the central role that Japan played in this process in the 1850–1920 period. Hybridization in the transfer of technology and business methods is a recurring theme in several chapters, with an important role for the agency of local actors. In doing so, the book contributes to the increasing number of studies [End Page 641] that consider the regions beyond the West not only as passive recipients of "advanced" Western technology but also pay attention to their active role as customizers, initiators, and also intraregional sharers. In the general introduction, the reader is introduced to the late nineteenth-century Japanese, Chinese, and Korean context by financial historians David Sicilia and David Wittner, who specialize in East Asian history. As they and many of their likely readers work largely outside the circle of historians of technology, they extensively explain the broad view of technology with which readers of this journal are quite familiar. Although modernization is central to the volume's title, the concept is not discussed extensively or problematized. An exception is the chapter by William Steele, in which he nuances the dominant narrative of Asian modernization as Westernization. The development of the rickshaw in Japan and its spread across Asia illustrate how local initiatives also contributed to modernization, underscoring the idea that modernity and modernization are neither uniform nor monolithic processes. The discussion about modernization in Asia as cited by Steele, however, does not resonate as such in the introduction. It is not connected with the active role of actors in Asia itself. The editors clearly use the concept to refer to the desire of governments to acquire Western technologies, practices, institutions, ideas, attitudes, etc. Wittner—who also published about the Tomioka Silk Filature and the Osaka Cotton Spinning Mill in T&C's April 2022 volume—illustrates how technology transfer in the Meiji period was largely determined by the wish to "modernize" and how the symbolic value of selected and imported technology was of greater importance than its contribution to technological and business functioning. For the Meiji government, the Tomioka silk mill was first and foremost a showcase of "modernity." The choices for the factory setup (brick and iron) and machines (imported from "advanced" France) underlined the "modernity" and "progress" of Japan. Sketching the role of Shibusawa Eiichi—a prominent businessman who for a short period was also involved in the Meiji government—who stressed the value of indigenous technological knowledge and expertise, Wittner shows that what is considered "truly modern" changes over time. Some other chapters, especially Kimura Masato's, highlight the role of Shibusawa as a driver of the transfer of Western technology and business practices to Japan and of the modification of those practices. The role of individuals in the transfer of ideas and business practices is also illustrated in Chen Yu's chapter about the Chinese entrepreneur and businessman Zhan Jian, who was inspired by what he saw as the successful Westernization of Japan and what he wanted to achieve in his own province, Jiangsu. A new aspect to the studies on international expositions is added by Jeffer Daykin—who illustrates how Japan deliberately chose to take over a setup for international exhibitions in which direct comparisons between artifacts were central, an approach that had been abandoned in the West at that time. [End Page 642] Unfortunately, only a few chapters provide a good overview of the promised intra-East Asian technology transfer from Japan. Apart from Steele's chapter on the rickshaw, Japan's role is also evident in the story of the spread of printing in China. Hon Tze-ki illustrates how the partnership with a major Japanese textbook publisher gave the Chinese company Commercial Press the opportunity to enter the market and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it