MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4372404296 · doi:10.1353/tech.2023.0098

Strands of Modernization: The Circulation of Technology and Business Practices in East Asia, 1850–1920 ed. by David B. Sicilia and David G. Wittner

2023· article· en· W4372404296 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésModernization theoryContext (archaeology)Theme (computing)East AsiaAgency (philosophy)Circulation (fluid dynamics)HistoryBusiness historyEconomic historyChinaPolitical scienceSociologyLawEngineeringArchaeologySocial scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Strands of Modernization: The Circulation of Technology and Business Practices in East Asia, 1850–1920 ed. by David B. Sicilia and David G. Wittner Mila Davids (bio) Strands of Modernization: The Circulation of Technology and Business Practices in East Asia, 1850–1920 Edited by David B. Sicilia and David G. Wittner. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. Pp. 208. This collection of essays aims to highlight the circulation of technology and business practices within East Asia and the central role that Japan played in this process in the 1850–1920 period. Hybridization in the transfer of technology and business methods is a recurring theme in several chapters, with an important role for the agency of local actors. In doing so, the book contributes to the increasing number of studies [End Page 641] that consider the regions beyond the West not only as passive recipients of "advanced" Western technology but also pay attention to their active role as customizers, initiators, and also intraregional sharers. In the general introduction, the reader is introduced to the late nineteenth-century Japanese, Chinese, and Korean context by financial historians David Sicilia and David Wittner, who specialize in East Asian history. As they and many of their likely readers work largely outside the circle of historians of technology, they extensively explain the broad view of technology with which readers of this journal are quite familiar. Although modernization is central to the volume's title, the concept is not discussed extensively or problematized. An exception is the chapter by William Steele, in which he nuances the dominant narrative of Asian modernization as Westernization. The development of the rickshaw in Japan and its spread across Asia illustrate how local initiatives also contributed to modernization, underscoring the idea that modernity and modernization are neither uniform nor monolithic processes. The discussion about modernization in Asia as cited by Steele, however, does not resonate as such in the introduction. It is not connected with the active role of actors in Asia itself. The editors clearly use the concept to refer to the desire of governments to acquire Western technologies, practices, institutions, ideas, attitudes, etc. Wittner—who also published about the Tomioka Silk Filature and the Osaka Cotton Spinning Mill in T&C's April 2022 volume—illustrates how technology transfer in the Meiji period was largely determined by the wish to "modernize" and how the symbolic value of selected and imported technology was of greater importance than its contribution to technological and business functioning. For the Meiji government, the Tomioka silk mill was first and foremost a showcase of "modernity." The choices for the factory setup (brick and iron) and machines (imported from "advanced" France) underlined the "modernity" and "progress" of Japan. Sketching the role of Shibusawa Eiichi—a prominent businessman who for a short period was also involved in the Meiji government—who stressed the value of indigenous technological knowledge and expertise, Wittner shows that what is considered "truly modern" changes over time. Some other chapters, especially Kimura Masato's, highlight the role of Shibusawa as a driver of the transfer of Western technology and business practices to Japan and of the modification of those practices. The role of individuals in the transfer of ideas and business practices is also illustrated in Chen Yu's chapter about the Chinese entrepreneur and businessman Zhan Jian, who was inspired by what he saw as the successful Westernization of Japan and what he wanted to achieve in his own province, Jiangsu. A new aspect to the studies on international expositions is added by Jeffer Daykin—who illustrates how Japan deliberately chose to take over a setup for international exhibitions in which direct comparisons between artifacts were central, an approach that had been abandoned in the West at that time. [End Page 642] Unfortunately, only a few chapters provide a good overview of the promised intra-East Asian technology transfer from Japan. Apart from Steele's chapter on the rickshaw, Japan's role is also evident in the story of the spread of printing in China. Hon Tze-ki illustrates how the partnership with a major Japanese textbook publisher gave the Chinese company Commercial Press the opportunity to enter the market and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,691
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,601

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,246
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle