MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375835077 · doi:10.1353/phx.2021.0029

Thucydides, the Athenians, and Harmodios and Aristogeiton

2021· article· en· W4375835077 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martha C. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scholars have long misread what Thucydides says about Athenians' knowledge of their liberation from the Peisistratid tyranny: he does not say that Athenians knew nothing true about it; he says, rather, that they said nothing true about it. Correction of this misreading invites critique of Thucydides' own account and agenda. Abstract: Les chercheurs ont longtemps mal lu le témoignage de Thucydide quant à ce que les Athéniens savaient de la manière dont ils avaient été libérés de la tyrannie de Pisistrate : il ne dit pas que les Athéniens ne savaient rien de vrai à ce sujet ; il dit plutôt qu'ils ne disaient rien de vrai à ce sujet. Corriger cette erreur de lecture nous mène à critiquer le récit même de Thucydide et les intentions qui le sous-tendent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207