MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PERANCANGAN E-MARKETPLACE HASIL PERTANIAN DI WILAYAH KABUPATEN TOBA BERBASIS WEB

2022· article· en· W4375841777 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Leo Nardo Sipayung, Marlyna Infryanty Hutapea, Jamaluddin Jamaluddin

Bibliographic record

VenueTAMIKA Jurnal Tugas Akhir Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi Akuntansi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessAgricultureAgricultural scienceAgricultural economicsCommerceMarketingGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toba Regency is one of the jurisdictions of North Sumatra Province which is located in a highland area with an altitude of 900-2200 meters. Most of the people in the Toba Regency area are farmers, ranchers and planters. At this time the development of information technology has grown very rapidly and affects all aspects of everyday life. So far, the sale of agricultural products in general is still using the traditional way where farmers still bring their agricultural products to the nearest market, making it difficult for farmers to sell agricultural products, and farmers can only rely on distributors and retailers to sell agricultural products, resulting in relatively low selling prices. cheap for farmers. E-marketplace is an electronic market that is used to carry out an activity or business activity between buyers and sellers to transact with each other. The purpose of this research is to facilitate the sale of agricultural products and make it easier for buyers to find the desired agricultural products. This website was developed using PHP and MySQL as the database. With the design of this e-marketplace, it can help local farmers in increasing the sales turnover of agricultural products because they can transact widely through the help of e-marketplaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTAMIKA Jurnal Tugas Akhir Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi AkuntansiSame topicInformation Retrieval and Data MiningFrench-language works237,207