MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375842439 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.39185

Estimation expédiée du risque érosif dans l’amont du bassin versant du Nahr el Kalb

2022· article· fr· W4375842439 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hussein El Hage Hassan, Laurence Charbel, Ali Khyami

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La dégradation du sol par l’érosion hydrique est un phénomène naturel qui peut être amplifié par les actions anthropiques. Les conséquences de ce phénomène sont néfastes et peuvent nuire aux caractères intrinsèques du sol, et entraîner sa disparition dans certains cas. Pour cartographier l’aléa érosion dans l’amont du bassin versant du Nahr el Kalb, nous avons adopté une approche hiérarchique, nommée MESALES, qui combine les paramètres pondérés de l’érosion (occupation du sol, pente, érodibilité du sol et climat) dans un Système d’information géographique (SIG). Afin de tenir compte des spécificités du milieu, l’érodibilité des sols a été calculée à partir de l’équation de Wischmeier et Smith (1960 ; 1978). Le bilan de ce travail montre le rôle prépondérant du couvert végétal. 67 % du périmètre d'étude subit une forte et très forte érosion, il s’agit essentiellement des secteurs ayant un couvert végétal dégradé ou en étant dépourvus. La précision globale du modèle et l'indice Kappa qui en sont ressortis sont estimés respectivement à 84 % et 80%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicSoil erosion and sediment transportFrench-language works237,207