Lateralized Neural Entropy modulates with Grip Force during Precision Grasping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When holding a coffee mug filled to the brim, we strive to avoid spilling the coffee. This ability relies on the neural processes underlying the control of finger forces on a moment-to-moment basis. The brain activity lateralized to the contralateral hemisphere averaged over a trial and across the trials is known to be associated with the magnitude of grip force applied on an object. However, the mechanistic involvement of the variability in neural signals during grip force control remains unclear. In this study, we examined the dependence of neural variability over the frontal, central, and parietal regions assessed using noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG) on grip force magnitude during an isometric force control task. We hypothesized laterally specific modulation in EEG variability with higher magnitude of the grip force exerted during grip force control. We utilized an existing EEG dataset (64 channel) comprised of healthy young adults, who performed an isometric force control task while receiving visual feedback of the force applied. The force magnitude to be exerted on the instrumented object was cued to participants during the task, and varied pseudorandomly among 5, 10, and 15% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) across the trials. We quantified neural variability via sample entropy (sequence-dependent measure) and standard deviation (sequence-independent measure) of the temporal EEG signal over the frontal, central, and parietal electrodes. The EEG sample entropy over the central electrodes showed lateralized, nonlinear, localized, modulation with force magnitude. Similar modulation was not observed over frontal or parietal EEG activity, nor for standard deviation in the EEG activity. Our findings highlight specificity in neural control of grip forces by demonstrating the modulation in sequence-dependent but not sequence-independent component of EEG variability. This modulation appeared to be lateralized, spatially constrained, and functionally dependent on the grip force magnitude. We discuss the relevance of these findings in scenarios where a finer precision is essential to enable grasp application, such as prosthesis and associated neural signal integration, and propose directions for future studies investigating the mechanistic role of neural entropy in grip force control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".