A comparison between knotted and knotless medial row of suture bridge technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The shoulder arthroscopic suture bridge technique is currently very popular, but scientific evidence relating to the clinical outcomes of the medial row with or without knots has not been systematic reviewed. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of knotted versus knotless double-row suture bridges for rotator cuff repairs. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHOD: Five databases that contain literature in English were searched (Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library), with a focus on works published between 2011 and 2022. Clinical data relating to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture bridge approach was examined and the outcomes of medial row knotting contrasted with that of the knotless technique. The search phrase used was: (double row) AND (rotator cuff) AND (repair), and the search method is subject term plus free word search. Literature quality evaluation was performed using the Cochrane "risk of bias" tool 1.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment instrument. RESULTS: One randomized controlled trial, four prospective cohort studies, and five retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Data pertaining to 1146 patients was drawn from these ten original papers and analyzed. Meta-analyses that were performed on 11 postoperative outcomes revealed that none of the differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05) and that the publications were unbiased (P > 0.05). Postoperative retear rate and postoperative retear categorization were the outcomes assessed. Scores on postoperative pain, forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation mobility were collated and evaluated. The University of California, Los Angeles scoring systems in the first year following surgery, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Constant scales in the first and second years after surgery were the secondary outcomes spotlighted in this study. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture bridge technique with or without a knotted medial row was proven to be equivalent. These outcomes are about postoperative retear, postoperative retear classification, postoperative shoulder function score, postoperative shoulder mobility, and postoperative pain, respectively. It should be noted that the conclusions are based on short-term clinical follow-up data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.022 | 0.069 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".