MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375906494 · doi:10.1353/phx.2021.0041

Portraying Cicero in Literature, Culture, and Politics, from Ancient to Modern Times ed. by Francesca Romana Berno and Giuseppe La Bua

2021· article· en· W4375906494 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James E. G. Zetzel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiceroPoliticsTheme (computing)LiteratureVirtueArtPortraitClassicsArt historyPhilosophyHistoryLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Portraying Cicero in Literature, Culture, and Politics, from Ancient to Modern Times ed. by Francesca Romana Berno and Giuseppe La Bua James E. G. Zetzel Portraying Cicero in Literature, Culture, and Politics, from Ancient to Modern Times. Edited by Francesca Romana Berno and Giuseppe La Bua. Berlin: De Gruyter. 2022. Pp. xxi, 486. Collective volumes based on conferences tend to unevenness, and this one, from a 2019 conference on the portrayal and reception of Cicero, is no exception. Informative and enjoyable lectures do not easily become substantive articles, and the theme of this volume is so broad that there is little coherence. The variety of portrayals is interesting but fragmented: medieval manuscript portraits of Cicero have little to do with his image in modern detective fiction, and discussions of stylistic imitation are a long way from the use of Cicero as a role model by John Adams or Robespierre. Several of the papers, moreover, are essentially anecdotal, simply providing illustrations of some aspect of Ciceronian reception without any real argument to connect them. That is true of Rita Degl'Innocenti Pierini on representations of Cicero's exile, of Giuseppe La Bua on the meanings of nobilitas, and of Andrew Sillett's random collection of apparent echoes of the opening phrase of In Catilinam 1. Kathryn Stutz's paper on Cicero in detective fiction is largely an annotated list, and her odd reference to "our modern valorization of truth and virtue in our legal heroes" (226) suggests a lack of awareness of the tradition of California noir (from Hammett to Chandler to Ross Macdonald) to which Steven Saylor's Roman Blood (which Stutz discusses) so clearly belongs. The discussion of Cicero's textual "voice" by Leanne Jansen, Christoph Pieper, and Bram van der Velden contains a useful treatment of the differences between imitations of Cicero in Latin pseudo-Ciceroniana and in Cassius Dio's Greek versions of Ciceronian speeches, but the technique of imitation that they make much of is nothing more than the age-old method of learning stylistics through prose composition. But even if the volume is rather less than the sum of its parts, many of the papers contain something worthwhile, and a few of them provide rather more than that. The volume opens with Robert Kaster's clear and precise comparison between Cicero's language while in exile about his departure from Rome and his later accounts of the same events. Alfredo Casamento uses a passage of the Brutus to examine the role of the audience in shaping the ideal orator, and Alejandro Díaz Fernández usefully compares Cicero's self-portrait as ideal governor in letters from Cilicia to his earlier advice to Quintus as governor of Asia and to his images of Scaevola Pontifex as ideal governor. Díaz Fernández ultimately shies away from saying that Cicero actually tried to embody his ideal of good provincial governance and instead settles for the tired concept of self-fashioning, but while Cicero indeed wanted to appear a good governor, he was even more concerned to be one. Among the papers dealing with later aspects of Cicero's reception, Thomas Keeline offers an intelligent and engaging analysis of a set of late antique epitaphs for Cicero found in the Symposium XII Sapientum in the Anthologia Latina. Fabio Gatti provides [End Page 381] a careful presentation of the Quaestura of Sebastiano Corradi, showing how Corradi used dialogue to refute criticisms of Cicero and to make him suitably proto-Christian to fit Counter-Reformation tastes. Cristina Martín Puente presents a lovely collection of manuscript portraits of Cicero, but her text is mostly description and has relatively little about iconography. Joanna Kenty well shows how John Adams both emulated Cicero as a public figure and saw himself to be like Cicero in experiencing the ingratitude of his country; she might also have mentioned the extraordinary letters between Adams and Jefferson comparing Cicero to Plato. The three papers in the last section of the volume make valuable contributions to intellectual history. Much more ambitious than Kenty's version of Adams is Igor...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207