FLPK-BiSeNet: Federated Learning Based on Priori Knowledge and Bilateral Segmentation Network for Image Edge Extraction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated learning can effectively ensure data security and improve the problem of data islanding. However, the performance of federated learning-based schemes could be better due to the imbalance of image data. Therefore, this paper proposes a federated learning approach based on priori knowledge and a bilateral segmentation network for image edge extraction. First, federated learning can distribute training images for some special complex images due to the small sample and unshared data. Then, the image with similar edge information to the original image is learned to obtain prior knowledge, and the local uniform sparsity method is used to strengthen the detail features and weaken the background features. Based on the bilateral segmentation network, we introduce a dilated pyramid pooling layer and multi-scale feature fusion module to fuse the shallow detailed features in the context path with the deep abstract features obtained through the dilated pyramid pooling. The final result is obtained by fusing the result with prior knowledge and the result with the context path. Finally, we conduct experiments on some public datasets, and the results show that the proposed method greatly improves extraction accuracy compared with the traditional and the most advanced methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it