Loi naturelle, révélation et droit des femmes dans le De Cive de Thomas Hobbes : un mariage malheureux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article prend pour point de départ la place toute particulière qu’occupent les femmes dans les normes légales dès l’Antiquité, y compris dans les textes sacrés, et notamment dans la législation sur le mariage et l’adultère. Nous présentons alors, à partir du De Cive , le jusnaturalisme théiste de Hobbes comme une tentative originale de fonder en Dieu et en raison les lois auxquelles sont soumises les femmes. Mais au moment de son exégèse des versets 5,31-32 de l’évangile de Matthieu sur la répudiation, il semble que son arsenal conceptuel vacille : entre règne temporel et autorité divine, la figure de Jésus menace l’édifice hobbesien de s’écrouler. Nous concluons sur l’idée que c’est encore la législation positive autour des femmes qui cristallise les problèmes cruciaux de l’anthropologie du droit et, plus largement, du rapport entre l'humain et le divin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".