Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article propose une relecture la controverse insécablement politique et épistémologique qui prend forme dans le problème musulman en France. Il retrace deux de ses motifs constitutifs : l’un libéral qui correspond au paradigme de la lutte contre la radicalisation, l’autre conservateur apparaissant avec la thèse du séparatisme islamiste. En creux de la dispute autour du problème musulman, il s’agit ensuite de retrouver le motif manquant – celui que l’on affirme socialiste – en vue d’appréhender autrement, de façon tout à fait sociologique, la réaffiliation religieuse parmi les immigrés et leurs enfants. Ce motif refoulé dans notre conscience collective est fondé sur l’appréhension du social comme dimension sui generis , irréductible tant à son identification libérale à une classe d’éléments reliés par l’analogie de propriétés sociales qu’à la réaction conservatrice déliant la nation des solidarités pratiques qui ne cessent pourtant de la parcourir. Intrinsèquement sociologique et politique, le motif socialiste se découvre en filigrane de la refondation réflexive qui prend forme dans le réinvestissement de la tradition islamique parmi les immigrés et leurs enfants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.045 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".