MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4375952727 · doi:10.30574/ijsra.2023.9.1.0322

Full spectrum medical cannabis (Vijaya) oil as a veterinary treatment for osteoarthritis, hip dysplasia and musculoskeletal disorders: A case series

2023· article· en· W4375952727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sudhakar Natarajan, Arzoo Puri

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Science and Research Archive · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisQuality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyBroad spectrumHip dysplasiaInternal medicineAlternative medicineSurgeryRadiographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In veterinary medicine, Osteoarthritis, Hip Dysplasia and pain disorders are commonly diagnosed conditions, and it presents significant difficulties for the well-being of canines. The aim of this case series is to report the use of full spectrum medical cannabis (vijaya) for treating symptoms such as pain, inflammation, impaired mobility. Four Labrador breed patients between 6 years to 8 years, suffering from acute mobility issues were diagnosed with OA and HD. All patients were administered 4 drops of the full spectrum oil, orally, twice daily. After one month of the treatment, there was significant change in the pain markers with improved mobility. The recommended dose is 0.16 mg/kg/body wt for management of OA and HD related pain and inflammation. A boost in appetite and quality of life was also observed. In the future it is important to incorporate new treatment options in the medical practice and further research needs to be conducted on its use for other illnesses and animal species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Science and Research ArchiveSame topicToxin Mechanisms and ImmunotoxinsFrench-language works237,207