Sufficient mesh polyhedral intralesional injection for treatment of keloids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recurrence of keloids after intralesional injections is significant, and a review of the literature shows an inconsistent range of success rates. In this study, the modified medical proportion and intralesional injection method were intended to enhance the treatment effect. METHODS: Twenty patients completed the study. Regional block anesthesia (lidocaine, ropivacaine) was performed. Triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL), 5-fluorouracil (25 mg/mL), and ropivacaine (7.5 mg/mL) were configured in a ratio of 2:1:4 and applied on the lesion by reticular injection (horizontal fan-shaped stratified and vertical shaking pressurized injection). The minimum volume of injection per square centimeter was approximately 3.5 mL. The outcome indicators were the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), treatment frequency. RESULTS: The patients had an 82% ± 7% average reduction in VSS scores and 89% ± 13% and 93% ± 10% reductions in VAS scores of pain and pruritus, respectively, after an average of 2.5 ± 0.7 injections administered within 1 year. CONCLUSION: The sufficient mesh polyhedral intralesional injection can achieve excellent results for the treatment of keloid scars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".