PERANCANGAN BUKU INTERAKTIF SEBAGAI MEDIA MANAJEMEN STRES PADA FASE QUARTER-LIFE CRISIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social media has become one of the causes of the rise in mental health problems of young adults in recent years. Quarter-Life Crisis is one of the mental health phenomena that become their problem. Lack of awareness about stress management is a problem for sufferers. The method of this research is descriptive qualitative research, the technique used in data collection based on interviewing experts in the field of psychology is the most relevant method to get maximum results for research in the field of mental health. Based on the results of the author's research, it was found that sufferers have two main problems in the career and romance aspects. Lack of information, the media, and someone who becomes a "homebase" or the place of emotional release to manage stress becomes a problem for them. Therefore, the writer looks for alternative solutions to this problem by designing an interactive book that aims to be one of the mediums of emotional release for sufferers. With this interactive book, it is hoped that sufferers can relieve the stress that is the impact of this Quarter-Life Crisis by venting their emotions in this interactive book.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".