PERANCANGAN BUKU INTERAKTIF SEBAGAI MEDIA MANAJEMEN STRES PADA FASE QUARTER-LIFE CRISIS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social media has become one of the causes of the rise in mental health problems of young adults in recent years. Quarter-Life Crisis is one of the mental health phenomena that become their problem. Lack of awareness about stress management is a problem for sufferers. The method of this research is descriptive qualitative research, the technique used in data collection based on interviewing experts in the field of psychology is the most relevant method to get maximum results for research in the field of mental health. Based on the results of the author's research, it was found that sufferers have two main problems in the career and romance aspects. Lack of information, the media, and someone who becomes a "homebase" or the place of emotional release to manage stress becomes a problem for them. Therefore, the writer looks for alternative solutions to this problem by designing an interactive book that aims to be one of the mediums of emotional release for sufferers. With this interactive book, it is hoped that sufferers can relieve the stress that is the impact of this Quarter-Life Crisis by venting their emotions in this interactive book.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it