MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376104257 · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/acd413

Parametric level-set inverse problems with stochastic background estimation

2023· article· en· W4376104257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaGeoscience BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse problemParametric statisticsMathematicsStochastic gradient descentMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsInverseGaussianScale (ratio)AlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceStatisticsArtificial neural networkGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study parametric shape reconstruction inverse problems in which the object of interest is embedded in a heterogeneous background medium that is known only approximately. We model the background medium as a Gaussian random field and pose shape reconstruction as a stochastic programming problem in which we seek to minimize the expected value, with respect to the background field, of a stochastic objective function. We develop a computationally efficient algorithm based on the sample average approximation that reduces the effect of uncertainty in the background medium on shape recovery. We demonstrate that by using accelerated stochastic gradient descent, we can apply our method to large-scale problems. The capabilities of our method are demonstrated on a simple two-dimensional model problem and in a more demanding application to a three-dimensional inverse conductivity problem in geophysical imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.258
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it