MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376107489 · doi:10.1029/2022je007694

Depth Distribution of Chlorine at Gale Crater, Mars, as Derived From the DAN and APXS Experiments Onboard the Curiosity Rover

2023· article· en· W4376107489 on OpenAlexaff
M. L. Litvak, И. Г. Митрофанов, R. Gellert, M. V. Djachkova, Denis Lisov, A. R. Vasavada, S. Czarnecki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Planets · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramGeologyImpact craterBedrockAstrobiologyAeolian processesChlorineMineralogyGeochemistryGeomorphologyMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The subsurface chlorine depth distribution at Gale crater has been studied using measurements from the Alpha Particle X‐ray Spectrometer (APXS) and Dynamic Albedo of Neutrons (DAN) instruments onboard NASA's Curiosity Mars rover. These measurements have been acquired at or near ∼30 drill holes made by Curiosity along its 30 km drive. APXS measured a ∼15 micron surface layer of bedrock and shallow depth of ∼5 cm of drill tailings. DAN is sensitive to the bulk (∼50 cm depth) chlorine abundance and that of other neutron absorbing elements. Joint analysis of APXS and DAN data shows that the chlorine distribution at Gale crater consists of two components: surficial chlorine with concentrations >1 wt.%, possibly controlled by aeolian deposition of Cl‐rich dust and surface alteration, and subsurface chlorine with concentrations <1 wt.%, likely a result of groundwater activity in the past.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research PlanetsSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207