A novel rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on marginal spectrum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fault diagnosis is an important method for maintaining the stable and safe running state of mechanical equipment. As most mechanical equipment faults are induced by the bearing assembly, bearing fault diagnosis is of considerable importance. At present, the mainstream intelligent diagnostic techniques include supervised learning and unsupervised learning. Supervised learning requires manual labeling and data classification, which is unfavorable for massive data amounts. Therefore, how to effectively use labeled data to increase the accuracy of diagnosis is critical, especially when the bearing failure cannot be labeled at the very beginning. This paper proposes a time–frequency analysis of the short-time Fourier transform and wavelet transform methods based on unsupervised learning. The time axis was integrated to obtain the marginal frequency of two frequency domains as a diagnostic feature, and then two clustering centroids were established automatically by the K-means of unsupervised learning. The signals were divided into two classes based on the nearest clustering centroid as the criteria for diagnosis. Finally, other bearings in different positions were classified and diagnosed using the nearest clustering centroid in the same experiment to verify the effectiveness of the method proposed in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".