MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376118067 · doi:10.30683/1927-7229.2023.12.06

True One Cell Chemical Analysis in Cancer Research: A Review

2023· review· en· W4376118067 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karen J. Campoverde Reyes, Guido F. Verbeck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolomicsCancerData scienceField (mathematics)Computational biologyProteomicsNeuroscienceComputer scienceCellBiologyBiochemical engineeringBioinformaticsEngineeringBiochemistryMathematicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

True One Cell (TOC) analysis Is becoming highly critical for functional studies of cancer cells. This is partially because it is the only form of analysis that provides an avenue for studying the heterogeneity and cell-to-cell variations of individual cancer cells, thus providing unique insight into complex regulatory processes that govern TOC functions within a tumor. Additionally, true one cell techniques are playing an increasingly important role in current attempts to implement TOC metabolomic and proteomic studies, as well as emerging attempts to spatially resolve TOC information. In this review we provide a brief overview of the basis of the field and discuss its applications in TOC metabolomics and proteomics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.289
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical OncologySame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207