Graph Self-Supervised Learning With Application to Brain Networks Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The less training data and insufficient supervision limit the performance of the deep supervised models for brain disease diagnosis. It is significant to construct a learning framework that can capture more information in limited data and insufficient supervision. To address these issues, we focus on self-supervised learning and aim to generalize the self-supervised learning to the brain networks, which are non-Euclidean graph data. More specifically, we propose an ensemble masked graph self-supervised framework named BrainGSLs, which incorporates 1) a local topological-aware encoder that takes the partially visible nodes as input and learns these latent representations, 2) a node-edge bi-decoder that reconstructs the masked edges by the representations of both the masked and visible nodes, 3) a signal representation learning module for capturing temporal representations from BOLD signals and 4) a classifier used for the classification. We evaluate our model on three real medical clinical applications: diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder (BD) and diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The results suggest that the proposed self-supervised training has led to remarkable improvement and outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, our method is able to identify the biomarkers associated with the diseases, which is consistent with the previous studies. We also explore the correlation of these three diseases and find the strong association between ASD and BD. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt of applying the idea of self-supervised learning with masked autoencoder on the brain network analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".