Highly efficient cell-microbead encapsulation using dielectrophoresis-assisted dual-nanowell array
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advancements in micro/nanofabrication techniques have led to the development of portable devices for high-throughput single-cell analysis through the isolation of individual target cells, which are then paired with functionalized microbeads. Compared with commercially available benchtop instruments, portable microfluidic devices can be more widely and cost-effectively adopted in single-cell transcriptome and proteome analysis. The sample utilization and cell pairing rate (∼33%) of current stochastic-based cell-bead pairing approaches are fundamentally limited by Poisson statistics. Despite versatile technologies having been proposed to reduce randomness during the cell-bead pairing process in order to statistically beat the Poisson limit, improvement of the overall pairing rate of a single cell to a single bead is typically based on increased operational complexity and extra instability. In this article, we present a dielectrophoresis (DEP)-assisted dual-nanowell array (ddNA) device, which employs an innovative microstructure design and operating process that decouples the bead- and cell-loading processes. Our ddNA design contains thousands of subnanoliter microwell pairs specifically tailored to fit both beads and cells. Interdigitated electrodes (IDEs) are placed below the microwell structure to introduce a DEP force on cells, yielding high single-cell capture and pairing rates. Experimental results with human embryonic kidney cells confirmed the suitability and reproducibility of our design. We achieved a single-bead capture rate of >97% and a cell-bead pairing rate of >75%. We anticipate that our device will enhance the application of single-cell analysis in practical clinical use and academic research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".