MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376125951 · doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100391

Insulated concrete form foundation wall as solar thermal energy storage for Cold-Climate building heating system

2023· article· en· W4376125951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Conversion and Management X · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolar Energy Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTRNSYSThermal energy storageBuilding envelopeEnvironmental sciencePassive solar building designSolar energyThermal massThermalStorage water heaterNuclear engineeringPhotovoltaic thermal hybrid solar collectorPhotovoltaic systemSolar water heatingStorage tankEngineeringProcess engineeringMeteorologyWaste managementMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringThermodynamicsWater heaterPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employing green energies for building energy sector decarbonization has captured the world’s attention in the current century. However, the imbalance between energy demand and availability necessitates designing reliable and cost-effective energy storage systems. The present study aims to propose an innovative building-integrated solar thermal storage method using insulated concrete form (ICF) foundation walls for residential buildings in cold climates such as that of Canada. Surplus solar thermal energy is stored inside the ICF wall, which has a high thermal capacity and mass and is integrated into the building envelope. The ICF wall and solar thermal collectors are coupled with a water-to-water heat pump to meet building space heating load and domestic hot water demand. Different configurations integrating the ICF wall are modeled and simulated in TRNSYS software to perform a yearly transient analysis. It is shown that a system with ICF walls has an 11% higher solar fraction (SF) than a similar system with a large water thermal storage tank. By replacing the solar thermal collector with a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal collector, the overall system solar fraction can increase to 20% above that of a similar system with a large water thermal storage tank system. An ICF-based system with a 16 m2 solar collector can completely cover nine months of space heating and domestic hot water load for a single-family house in London, Ontario. A detailed sensitivity analysis shows that the proposed ICF-based systems achieve an optimum solar fraction at high tilt angles (65-70°), unlike a similar design with an extensive water thermal storage tank system. Because of their ability to achieve a high SF at high tilt angles, ICF systems are suitable for vertically mounted solar systems typically required by high-rise buildings due to limited roof area. As part of the building envelope, ICF foundation walls have no additional cost and can be considered a feasible strategy for reducing the residential sector’s carbon footprint..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it