MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376127455 · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2023.05.009

Vaping and Hookah Use Among Medical Trainees: A Multinational Survey Study

2023· article· en· W4376127455 on OpenAlexaff
Luiza Helena Degani‐Costa, Fernando Bruno, Fernanda Gushken, Cláudia Szlejf, Ana Bresser Pereira Tokeshi, Yasmin F Tehrani, Daniel E. Kaufman, K K L Prasad, Siva Santosh Kumar Pentapati, Limalemla Jamir, Matthew G.K. Benesch, Morag G. Ryan, Hardeep Lotay, Jonathan Fuld, Thiago Marques Fidalgo, J R R Fernandes, Christian Douradinho, Paulo César Rodrigues Pinto Corrêa, Antônio Carlos Aguiar Brandão, Vilson Geraldo de Campos, Lara Gandolfo, Oscar César Pires, R.A Mello, Marli Maria Knorst, Carlos Leonardo Carvalho Pessôa, Ricardo Prado Golmia, Guilherme Borges Gomes da Silva, Karine Corcione Turke Antônio, Carlos Palandri Chagas Carla, Janice Baister Lantieri, Yasmin Paz De Marchi, Daniel Lacerda Heringer, Bruna Granig Valente, Larissa Moreira David, Carolina Lacerda Souza, Juliana Monteiro Ramos, Rafael Moura de Almeida, Thainá Mendonça Bentes, Vinicius Ryu Kami, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Marina Toscano Silveira, Arthur Somavila Barros, Vicente Bigolin Hauli, Luís Fernando Bouzas, Antonia Worcman de Carvalho, Juliana Moreira Guerra, Gabriel Lima Benchimol, Lincoln Basilio Alves, Victória Mourão Luz, Caroline Meneses Resende, Antonio Andrei da Silva Sena, Ana Karoline Mendes Sales, Gabriel Victor Silva Pereira, Aditi Mohta, Pentapati SS Kumar, Devi Madhavi Bhimarasetty, Makineedi Rama Lakshmi, Rajesh Neeluri, V Mahesh, Pradnya V. Shinde, Radha Ramani Bonu, Chithra Boovaragasamy, Gnanamani Gnanasabai, Simmi Oberoi, Aman Dev Singh, Tumul Nandan, Cameron Ghassemi

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBinge drinkingEnvironmental healthCross-sectional studyPublic healthTobacco useDemographySuicide preventionPoison controlPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Preventive MedicineSame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207